Randall Kennedy would be his name, and from what I saw, he tried to deceive his way into the embargoed sessions. Thankfully, such a character was not allowed access to the pre-release Windows 7 seminar, and for good reason.

I’m dedicating today’s post to the damage caused by sensationalist posts. The most recent one by Randall Kennedy (I’ll quote it directly at the end; there’s no reason to give his articles more traffic than how much he has already gotten) couldn’t possibly contain more lies and misgivings than it already does. Let’s round up the points and talk about where he’s gone wrong:

• Randall refers to the Windows 7 early 2009 beta launch as a “delay of [significant] magnitude.”
  Right. A zero-time delay is a delay of significant magnitude? Microsoft has originally intended for Windows 7 to hit public beta in early 2009, just like I was personally told by a solid number of trustworthy people (both inebriated and sober) at PDC.
• “[The beta] was generally accepted to be slated for the mid-December 2008 timeframe”
  By who? A few bloggers heard from their own internal sources that that was Microsoft’s target, but since when did that supplant official timelines? Bloggers with significant connections are good for when companies don’t talk, but when companies release official information on things such as timelines, etc., it’s a good idea to trust the official statements.
• “It’ll give the company a chance to take another pass at the kernel code base and maybe, just maybe, reconsider dropping some of that consumer-focused baggage.”
  Microsoft focuses on “consumer-focused baggage” in a client operating system because the people who will be using the operating system are consumers, either in a business environment or a home environment. Regardless, the idea with a client OS is to appeal to the user using it, thus allowing the user to get more work done faster while having more fun during free time.
• “I especially like the part where he says that Windows 7 is ‘in the can. It’s done. There are no major changes coming.’”
  That’s right. No other major features will be added. In other words, there won’t see a brand new framework being added, nor a huge change to Explorer being made. However, with this in mind, significant usability changes can be made to anything in current Windows 7 builds. There’s still lots of work to be done. Otherwise, the OS would have been released in January instead of simply entering beta.
  It’s as if the term “beta” lost all meaning. I blame Google for this travesty.
• “As an FOM (Friend of Microsoft) in good standing, Paul should know.”
  There’s no such thing as a Friend of Microsoft. This is Randall’s way of painting characters as Elitist and Out of Touch… much like politicians. Paul stated his opinions on the user interface, but Paul has a right to do that. So does everyone who used the new user interface in Windows 7 (assuming it’s the newest iteration of it). This is what the UX teams want! That’s the whole idea behind getting feedback!
• “He gets special access to all sorts of supersecret Microsoft stuff — a reward for his normally glowing coverage of all things Redmond.”
  No, he gets access because he has ridiculous readership and unbiased coverage. He voices his opinions when he has concerns about something and he voices praise when he sees praiseworthy material. Many developers within Microsoft read the WinSuperSite and listen to Windows Weekly because Paul is able to provide middle-man insight into what people think should come to a Microsoft product and what people think should stay out. His own experiences also contribute to this.
• “Maybe they can just pre-install it on the FREE LAPTOP COMPUTER I requested.”
  It’s interesting. The laptops were loaned to reviewers for evaluation purposes (so that these bloggers and journalists could use and comment on every bit within Windows 7 during the beta). They weren’t given to journalists to influence positive reviews; they were given to influence accurate reviews of all features rather than partial reviews of Windows 7 as time goes on.
  However, if Microsoft did give Randall a laptop, Randall would likely have been swayed into doing positive reviews as opposed to what seems to be his typical hit-and-run slander.
  In other words, Microsoft did the right thing by not lending him a laptop. Otherwise, they might have unfairly influenced Randall’s commentary. Sick yet effective irony, all in all.

It can safely be assumed that there’s no other relevant content worth reading in the remainder of Randall’s post. This post, as well as others by him, are made for the point of drawing traffic to InfoWorld. Frankly, I feel terrible that any respectable publication has to rely on this kind of sensationalism to keep readership.

There’s a certain type of respect which a majority of bloggers strive for: respect from genuinely interested readers. It’s what we at AeroXperience aim for with both the forums and the blog, and it’s what Paul, Mary Jo, Rafael, Neowin, WinVistaClub, WinFuture, TheVista.ru, etc. all aim for. Our objective is to provide original content to those of you who are interested in Microsoft’s latest developments, and you should feel free to call us out whenever you see a problem in our coverage. Other outlets have different objectives, but all of us aim to disperse our content and attract readership truthfully and honorably.

Based on what I read in Randall’s post today and on what I saw from him at PDC, I don’t believe this to be the case for Randall.

Then again, desperation is to be expected in an economy where publishers are dropping employees like flies.

Read Randall’s opinion post after the jump.

No Windows 7 public beta until 2009

How my scathing rebuke of Windows 7 scared Microsoft into delaying the Windows 7 public Beta until 2009.

Source: InfoWorld

TAGS: Microsoft, Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP

Sometimes I don’t know my own strength. After several painful weeks of poking holes in the Windows 7 bubble (and being poked right back by the legions of Windows zealots), it seems my message about Microsoft not doing enough to satisfy IT is finally getting through: The company has now officially delayed the release of the first public Windows 7 beta until “early 2009″ — per the company’s PR firm, Waggener Edstrom.

A delay of this magnitude, hot on the heels of our scathing rebuke of the PDC pre-beta, can mean only one thing: It’s running scared. Microsoft is so concerned by the overwhelming response to our groundbreaking expose, “Windows 7 unmasked,” that it’s pulling back on the delivery reins so that it can retool the product to address the myriad performance and compatibility issues we identified.

I, for one, applaud their honesty. Microsoft knows it’s dropped the ball with Windows 7; the initial PDC build was woefully inadequate and demonstrated none of the claimed improvements in performance or resource consumption. Delaying the public beta program — which was generally accepted to be slated for the mid-December 2008 timeframe — is a smart move. It’ll give the company a chance to take another pass at the kernel code base and maybe, just maybe, reconsider dropping some of that consumer-focused baggage.

So, it’s no Windows 7 Beta for Christmas this year, kids. You’ll just have to keep playing with Vista or, if you’re lucky, the “Blue Badge” unlocked version of the PDC build (6801). In the meantime, check out Paul Thurrott’s concerns about the Windows 7 GUI and how it’s “easy” but not “simple” — or was it the other way around?

I especially like the part where he says that Windows 7 is “in the can. It’s done. There are no major changes coming.” As an FOM (Friend of Microsoft) in good standing, Paul should know. He gets special access to all sorts of supersecret Microsoft stuff — a reward for his normally glowing coverage of all things Redmond. So when even he voices his concern over an issue (the befuddling Windows 7 GUI) and follows it up by stating that the product is basically finished at this point, you know we’re in trouble.

Note: So far, I’ve focused mostly on the kernel mode aspects of Windows 7. But since it turns out there’s really nothing to see down there (it’s basically Vista + some minor tweaks), I think it may be time I turned my attention to the stuff that actually has changed — i.e., the shell glitz and other user-land components.

Anybody got a spare copy of a post-PDC build I can borrow? We asked Microsoft for a copy but the company said it “can’t accommodate us” at this time (code for: you’re blacklisted!)

Maybe they can just pre-install it on the FREE LAPTOP COMPUTER I requested. I’m still waiting to hear back from them on that one, but so far it doesn’t look good. Oh well…maybe next year!

Posted by Randall C. Kennedy on November 25, 2008 03:00 AM

In a word, Nehalem is major. The motherboard they had to test on had bugs limiting performance in memory and GPU related areas, but Nehalem nonetheless manages to well and truly top-trump a higher-clocked Penryn in every test. A 2.66Ghz Nehalem boasts a 20-50% performance increase over the 3.2Ghz Penryn, currently the fastest processor on the market. And that’s not as high as this thing will clock.

Check out the article for yourself, but here are a few quotes to whet your apetite:

• “Memory accesses on Conroe/Penryn were quick due to Intel’s very aggressive prefetchers, memory accesses on Nehalem are just plain fast. Nehalem takes a little over 2/3 the time to complete a memory request as Penryn”
• “In short: Nehalem can get data out of memory quick like bunnies.”
• “Clock for clock, Nehalem is nearly 28% faster than Penryn in our DivX test. Even better is when you put this performance in perspective: at 2.66GHz Nehalem is faster than the fastest Penryn available today the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 running at 3.2GHz. At 3.2GHz, Nehalem will be fast”
• “It’s months before Nehalem’s launch and there’s already no equal in sight, it will take far more than Phenom to make this thing sweat.”

Read the Article at Anandtech