<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why &#8220;Bing&#8221; might be a name destined to fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:38:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Bing is garbage just like all the other microsoft products. Google is better, bing may bring you more results but only 10 are actually what you are looking for. The rest are what Bing thinks you should be looking for. IF you don&#039;t believe do a search for BIng Sucks. the first 10 or so will be actually sites the rest will be Microsoft Sites singing the praise of BIng. Geez I wonder way Microsoft would act like bing is the greastest thing since Windows CE, or Windows ME, or Windows NT, or WIndows 2000. The list goes on and on of Microsoft Crap, that doesnt work right that they push and drops support on a year after the release date. Dont even get me started on the Crap Box. Look Microsoft is the poster company for failures. They are just the champs in marketing. SO please consumer make your on decisions dont let microsoft convince you it is good cause they say it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing is garbage just like all the other microsoft products. Google is better, bing may bring you more results but only 10 are actually what you are looking for. The rest are what Bing thinks you should be looking for. IF you don&#8217;t believe do a search for BIng Sucks. the first 10 or so will be actually sites the rest will be Microsoft Sites singing the praise of BIng. Geez I wonder way Microsoft would act like bing is the greastest thing since Windows CE, or Windows ME, or Windows NT, or WIndows 2000. The list goes on and on of Microsoft Crap, that doesnt work right that they push and drops support on a year after the release date. Dont even get me started on the Crap Box. Look Microsoft is the poster company for failures. They are just the champs in marketing. SO please consumer make your on decisions dont let microsoft convince you it is good cause they say it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Robbins</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Robbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/#comment-921</guid>
		<description>In all honesty, I don&#039;t see where Microsoft is trying to take us (the PC using public at large) anymore.

It took me a LONG time to jump on the Microsoft bandwagon ... I was a staunch WordPerfect user back in the 80s - early 90s.   Word?   What the heck was everyone going to do with all that complicated stuff?  Words I truly ate!  By around 93 I was ALL aboard the Microsoft trip.   With the dawn of XP, it looked like MS truly beat the IBM / monopolistic scare talk of the US govt and really made the PC feel PERSONAL.

My exerience is in the tech field ... I&#039;ve supported desktop PCs in the corporate world for over 20 years.

Bill Gates is what I truly consider an American Success and National Hero.   He made his fortune, changed the world as we know it, married someone he seems genuinely happy with ... and if that weren&#039;t enough, now he&#039;s feeding the hungry and impoverished.   My God!   It&#039;s amazing.

What I&#039;m also finding amazing about Mr. Gates is that he seems to completely BE Microsoft.   Since he left, MS as a company has nosedived faster than the US Economy!   These products!   What ARE THEY?

I just bought a new PC (a very nicely decked out HP ... bravo for coming as far as they have with the Pavilion line!).  It&#039;s a dual core Centrino2 (2.4 ghz), 4gb RAM, 500 gb HD, the list goes on and on.   I conceivably have more power in my little 7 pound (ouch) notebook than most companies had in their employ back when I was starting my career.

Is it too much to ask for Vista running in a 64-bit environment (a PC users wet-dream to finally be reality) to actually work?   I&#039;ve been reading message board after message board trying to solve some of my own technical issues, and MS has danced around these ridiculous problems for YEARS ... and they&#039;ve been allowed to do it!

I REALLY hope Google is developing the next OS ... or I swear ... I WILL fork over the thousands of dollars to replace all my apps to go MAC.  At least those things seem to consistently work ... Apple hasn&#039;t seemingly decided that their future lie in a VIDEO GAME MARKET!

*ahem*  Now about this Bing thing.   Bing?   Mohave (perpetrated as a fraud, no less ...) THIS from the company that I seriously thought about getting a tattoo with the NT Server box logo because it was so cool (I didn&#039;t, thank God)?   This (MS) is the company that literally shoved poor little Novel out to pasture WAY before it&#039;s time ... because NT was a good-enough product to stand.

I stumbled onto your website by accident (or coincidence) looking for yet another answer (which doesn&#039;t exist) to a question about why things in Vista never seem to get done correctly (and I&#039;ve seen Win7 ... it&#039;s WORSE).   I hope my complete and utter RANT here doesn&#039;t offend anyone ... hopefully somebody will hear my plea and take it to task to get MS back together and save Americas PCs (or something like that).

Apple&#039;s cute and all, but GEEZ, can u imagine having to look at smiley faces and bombs on the screen to troubleshoot?   I like music and pretty pictures too, but I want my PC to be the ROCK and workhorse that it once was.

Thank you for listening.

dr
NYC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all honesty, I don&#8217;t see where Microsoft is trying to take us (the PC using public at large) anymore.</p>
<p>It took me a LONG time to jump on the Microsoft bandwagon &#8230; I was a staunch WordPerfect user back in the 80s &#8211; early 90s.   Word?   What the heck was everyone going to do with all that complicated stuff?  Words I truly ate!  By around 93 I was ALL aboard the Microsoft trip.   With the dawn of XP, it looked like MS truly beat the IBM / monopolistic scare talk of the US govt and really made the PC feel PERSONAL.</p>
<p>My exerience is in the tech field &#8230; I&#8217;ve supported desktop PCs in the corporate world for over 20 years.</p>
<p>Bill Gates is what I truly consider an American Success and National Hero.   He made his fortune, changed the world as we know it, married someone he seems genuinely happy with &#8230; and if that weren&#8217;t enough, now he&#8217;s feeding the hungry and impoverished.   My God!   It&#8217;s amazing.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m also finding amazing about Mr. Gates is that he seems to completely BE Microsoft.   Since he left, MS as a company has nosedived faster than the US Economy!   These products!   What ARE THEY?</p>
<p>I just bought a new PC (a very nicely decked out HP &#8230; bravo for coming as far as they have with the Pavilion line!).  It&#8217;s a dual core Centrino2 (2.4 ghz), 4gb RAM, 500 gb HD, the list goes on and on.   I conceivably have more power in my little 7 pound (ouch) notebook than most companies had in their employ back when I was starting my career.</p>
<p>Is it too much to ask for Vista running in a 64-bit environment (a PC users wet-dream to finally be reality) to actually work?   I&#8217;ve been reading message board after message board trying to solve some of my own technical issues, and MS has danced around these ridiculous problems for YEARS &#8230; and they&#8217;ve been allowed to do it!</p>
<p>I REALLY hope Google is developing the next OS &#8230; or I swear &#8230; I WILL fork over the thousands of dollars to replace all my apps to go MAC.  At least those things seem to consistently work &#8230; Apple hasn&#8217;t seemingly decided that their future lie in a VIDEO GAME MARKET!</p>
<p>*ahem*  Now about this Bing thing.   Bing?   Mohave (perpetrated as a fraud, no less &#8230;) THIS from the company that I seriously thought about getting a tattoo with the NT Server box logo because it was so cool (I didn&#8217;t, thank God)?   This (MS) is the company that literally shoved poor little Novel out to pasture WAY before it&#8217;s time &#8230; because NT was a good-enough product to stand.</p>
<p>I stumbled onto your website by accident (or coincidence) looking for yet another answer (which doesn&#8217;t exist) to a question about why things in Vista never seem to get done correctly (and I&#8217;ve seen Win7 &#8230; it&#8217;s WORSE).   I hope my complete and utter RANT here doesn&#8217;t offend anyone &#8230; hopefully somebody will hear my plea and take it to task to get MS back together and save Americas PCs (or something like that).</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s cute and all, but GEEZ, can u imagine having to look at smiley faces and bombs on the screen to troubleshoot?   I like music and pretty pictures too, but I want my PC to be the ROCK and workhorse that it once was.</p>
<p>Thank you for listening.</p>
<p>dr<br />
NYC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agree</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/comment-page-1/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>Agree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/#comment-920</guid>
		<description>I must agree with Jug.
When I first heard of Google, I said, &quot;What the heck is that?  Weird name!&quot;
Shortly thereafter, I started hearing people say &quot;I googled [whatever]&quot; and I thought: that sounds weird. Google as a verb.
Now, people naturally use Google as a verb, just like Xerox (&quot;Please copy this&quot; &quot;Please xerox this&quot;)
Google will be one of the words that has moved from the private domain to the public vernacualr, like xerox, kleenex, etc.
Wil this happen to Bing?  Maybe, maybe not.  Only time will tell.

The same thinking should also go into whether or not Bing is a good search/decision engine.  Only time will tell.
It does not give results quite as comprehensive as Google, but I like its other features and the nice pictures,and the video feature is fantastic..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree with Jug.<br />
When I first heard of Google, I said, &#8220;What the heck is that?  Weird name!&#8221;<br />
Shortly thereafter, I started hearing people say &#8220;I googled [whatever]&#8221; and I thought: that sounds weird. Google as a verb.<br />
Now, people naturally use Google as a verb, just like Xerox (&#8221;Please copy this&#8221; &#8220;Please xerox this&#8221;)<br />
Google will be one of the words that has moved from the private domain to the public vernacualr, like xerox, kleenex, etc.<br />
Wil this happen to Bing?  Maybe, maybe not.  Only time will tell.</p>
<p>The same thinking should also go into whether or not Bing is a good search/decision engine.  Only time will tell.<br />
It does not give results quite as comprehensive as Google, but I like its other features and the nice pictures,and the video feature is fantastic..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/#comment-919</guid>
		<description>I think the point with Google is that it has been said so long it sounds natural and if Bing can generate the steam to push through it could work.
Where to eat?  Just Google/Bing Restaurant near xxxxx.  hmm Just Bing it!!  haha new Nike slogan Just Bing it.  Hm... I Binged her....  well that does sound a little more provocative than I Googled her.  Before going on an interview you should really Bing the company.  Any way say it enough and it starts to flow.
I hope this article makes it into my next Bing search..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the point with Google is that it has been said so long it sounds natural and if Bing can generate the steam to push through it could work.<br />
Where to eat?  Just Google/Bing Restaurant near xxxxx.  hmm Just Bing it!!  haha new Nike slogan Just Bing it.  Hm&#8230; I Binged her&#8230;.  well that does sound a little more provocative than I Googled her.  Before going on an interview you should really Bing the company.  Any way say it enough and it starts to flow.<br />
I hope this article makes it into my next Bing search..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jug</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Jug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/#comment-909</guid>
		<description>Haha. This article is hopefully written with a major tongue in cheek. ;)

For example:
&quot;Cuil sure as hell didn’t work because no one knew how the hell to pronounce it.&quot;

No, it didn&#039;t work because it couldn&#039;t search. Nearly at all. Try it, it&#039;s still running.

This article puts way too much emphasis on the names. Bing is a bit silly, but so is Google. It just &quot;feels right&quot; because we&#039;re so used to Google. Because it&#039;s a good service, not because it has a good name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha. This article is hopefully written with a major tongue in cheek. <img src='http://winjade.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>For example:<br />
&#8220;Cuil sure as hell didn’t work because no one knew how the hell to pronounce it.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, it didn&#8217;t work because it couldn&#8217;t search. Nearly at all. Try it, it&#8217;s still running.</p>
<p>This article puts way too much emphasis on the names. Bing is a bit silly, but so is Google. It just &#8220;feels right&#8221; because we&#8217;re so used to Google. Because it&#8217;s a good service, not because it has a good name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bayliss</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bayliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 08:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/#comment-918</guid>
		<description>You said it buddy.

They were obviously in a meeting and said &quot;We need a noun domain! Like Google!&quot;

Sadly they settled on the worst name I have ever heard in my life.

It has already failed, because the name is absolutely abysmal.

Live Search sounded fine - and they should go back to naming things in a way that makes sense, in groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said it buddy.</p>
<p>They were obviously in a meeting and said &#8220;We need a noun domain! Like Google!&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly they settled on the worst name I have ever heard in my life.</p>
<p>It has already failed, because the name is absolutely abysmal.</p>
<p>Live Search sounded fine &#8211; and they should go back to naming things in a way that makes sense, in groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryant</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 03:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/#comment-905</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Where was the peanut gallery when the name AeroXperience was decided?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I wasn&#039;t here for that. Thankfully, I can also say it&#039;s not going to be a problem in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Where was the peanut gallery when the name AeroXperience was decided?</p></blockquote>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t here for that. Thankfully, I can also say it&#8217;s not going to be a problem in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 02:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Where was the peanut gallery when the name AeroXperience was decided?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where was the peanut gallery when the name AeroXperience was decided?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing - Microsoft's new &#34;Decision engine&#34; - Emuforums.com</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/comment-page-1/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing - Microsoft's new &#34;Decision engine&#34; - Emuforums.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 13:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/#comment-910</guid>
		<description>[...] not already a Microsoft search user, what would make you switch? What would it take for you to</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not already a Microsoft search user, what would make you switch? What would it take for you to</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGDog</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/comment-page-1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2009/05/why_bing_name_destined_to_fail/#comment-917</guid>
		<description>That logo has definitely gotta go.  First off... they have it in all lower-case.  It&#039;s diminuitive... non assertive.  And the font is all rounded with no hard angles too it (like the &quot;n&quot; for example).  It needs to converys that it&#039;s powerful, and yet not intimidating.  It&#039;s weird all the B.S. ya gotta do to make the hordes of dumb masses pickup on something.  Even when the interface is badass you still need word-of-mouth for it to really ignite and catch hold.

RE: the &quot;bing vs. ping&quot; thing... I can sure as heck tell ya it&#039;ll aggravate Techies that have to interfact with the moronic masses at large in the phone support arena.  Tech - &quot;Can you please ping this address...&quot; Caller -&quot;It doesn&#039;t come up with any search results.&quot;  Techie - slaps forehead.

I&#039;m totally agree&#039;ing with the author about how the name has to catch on.  Young non-techie chics were the first ones I ever heard using &quot;google&quot; as a verb in a sentence. &quot;I Google&#039;d it.&quot; (Still irks my ears everytime I hear anybody use it that way, Eeesh.)  It became trendy and hip to say it that way.  And THAT makes it seem like your hip and in-the-know, and since nobody wants to look like a fool who&#039;s &quot;not-in-the-loop&quot; they all start saying that way just so they don&#039;t fear somebody perceiving them for the noobs that they are.

&quot;Decision engine&quot; &lt;-- What the hell is that?  I don&#039;t want you making &quot;decisions&quot; on what to show me.  Freakin show it all to me.  I&#039;ll look at the results and figure out how to change my search terms accordingly.  Sounds like their taking the thinking away from you.  If they push this buzzword... their WAY dead before they start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That logo has definitely gotta go.  First off&#8230; they have it in all lower-case.  It&#8217;s diminuitive&#8230; non assertive.  And the font is all rounded with no hard angles too it (like the &#8220;n&#8221; for example).  It needs to converys that it&#8217;s powerful, and yet not intimidating.  It&#8217;s weird all the B.S. ya gotta do to make the hordes of dumb masses pickup on something.  Even when the interface is badass you still need word-of-mouth for it to really ignite and catch hold.</p>
<p>RE: the &#8220;bing vs. ping&#8221; thing&#8230; I can sure as heck tell ya it&#8217;ll aggravate Techies that have to interfact with the moronic masses at large in the phone support arena.  Tech &#8211; &#8220;Can you please ping this address&#8230;&#8221; Caller -&#8221;It doesn&#8217;t come up with any search results.&#8221;  Techie &#8211; slaps forehead.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m totally agree&#8217;ing with the author about how the name has to catch on.  Young non-techie chics were the first ones I ever heard using &#8220;google&#8221; as a verb in a sentence. &#8220;I Google&#8217;d it.&#8221; (Still irks my ears everytime I hear anybody use it that way, Eeesh.)  It became trendy and hip to say it that way.  And THAT makes it seem like your hip and in-the-know, and since nobody wants to look like a fool who&#8217;s &#8220;not-in-the-loop&#8221; they all start saying that way just so they don&#8217;t fear somebody perceiving them for the noobs that they are.</p>
<p>&#8220;Decision engine&#8221; &lt;&#8211; What the hell is that?  I don&#8217;t want you making &#8220;decisions&#8221; on what to show me.  Freakin show it all to me.  I&#8217;ll look at the results and figure out how to change my search terms accordingly.  Sounds like their taking the thinking away from you.  If they push this buzzword&#8230; their WAY dead before they start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
