<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First here: The Old Taskbar still exists (but not really)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:13:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/#comment-410</guid>
		<description>People who use a multi-monitor taskbar (e.g. Ultramon) have a very good reason not to like the new taskbar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who use a multi-monitor taskbar (e.g. Ultramon) have a very good reason not to like the new taskbar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Tebo</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Tebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/#comment-409</guid>
		<description>I was just joking anyway. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just joking anyway. <img src='http://winjade.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Tebo</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Tebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, I know he does great quality audio and video. That is one of the big reasons why I like this site so much. :) Also, point taken on the putting out things all at once thought. That makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, I know he does great quality audio and video. That is one of the big reasons why I like this site so much. <img src='http://winjade.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Also, point taken on the putting out things all at once thought. That makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nexus</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Nexus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>forget the fact they take a while to render because he does do awesome quality videos (audio and vid) if he did put them all of his PDC content out at one time you (and i know myself) would digest it all back to back and be done with it in the better part of a day and then we would go back to waiting for the beta build.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>forget the fact they take a while to render because he does do awesome quality videos (audio and vid) if he did put them all of his PDC content out at one time you (and i know myself) would digest it all back to back and be done with it in the better part of a day and then we would go back to waiting for the beta build.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Barlow</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Barlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 05:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Looks nice :) However, just a modified version of the vista Taskbar is on Build 6801 of Windows 7...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks nice <img src='http://winjade.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  However, just a modified version of the vista Taskbar is on Build 6801 of Windows 7&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Tebo</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Tebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/#comment-399</guid>
		<description>Thank you Bryant. Well said! I couldn&#039;t agree more with you! Why does everyone feel the need to revert back to the old all the time when half of the time they complain about it before the new is shown? LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Bryant. Well said! I couldn&#8217;t agree more with you! Why does everyone feel the need to revert back to the old all the time when half of the time they complain about it before the new is shown? LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryant</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/#comment-400</guid>
		<description>This taskbar is so ridiculously easy to learn that I can understand the reluctance behind the decision to add a &quot;classic taskbar&quot; function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This taskbar is so ridiculously easy to learn that I can understand the reluctance behind the decision to add a &#8220;classic taskbar&#8221; function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Going from Win 3.1 to Win95 didn&#039;t cause me any trouble so a slight taskbar change shouldn&#039;t bother anyone&#039;s habits too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going from Win 3.1 to Win95 didn&#8217;t cause me any trouble so a slight taskbar change shouldn&#8217;t bother anyone&#8217;s habits too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Whatever happened to give users choice and making everything optional? For those that don&#039;t like the new taskbar or aren&#039;t accustomed to it (I welcome it though), why not a simple &quot;Classic taskbar&quot; option. After all the taskbar&#039;s been there from Windows 95 and it is hard for people to change their computing habits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to give users choice and making everything optional? For those that don&#8217;t like the new taskbar or aren&#8217;t accustomed to it (I welcome it though), why not a simple &#8220;Classic taskbar&#8221; option. After all the taskbar&#8217;s been there from Windows 95 and it is hard for people to change their computing habits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://winjade.net/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeroxp.org/2008/10/exc-the-old-taskbar-still-exists-but-not-really/#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Whatever happened to give users choice and options in Windows 7? For those who don&#039;t like the new taskbar (I certainly welcome it), fallback to &quot;Classic taskbar&quot;. I hope they do it by RTM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to give users choice and options in Windows 7? For those who don&#8217;t like the new taskbar (I certainly welcome it), fallback to &#8220;Classic taskbar&#8221;. I hope they do it by RTM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
